Which progress measurement approach would most likely be used to value progress based on an expert's judgment rather than verifiable data?

Which progress measurement approach would most likely be used to value progress based on an expert's judgment rather than verifiable data?

• A. Supervisor opinion.
• B. Start/Finish.
• C. Units Completed.
• D. Cost Ratio.

Answer: (A)

When you can’t rely on verifiable data to prove how much work is done, you turn to expert judgment to value progress. The supervisor’s opinion captures this because a qualified supervisor or expert uses their experience and understanding of the task to estimate how far along the work is. This subjective assessment is appropriate when measurable evidence isn’t available or is hard to obtain yet. In contrast, Start/Finish depends on scheduling and observable milestones, units completed require counting tangible deliverables, and cost ratio relies on actual costs compared to planned costs. All of those depend on data you can verify, whereas the supervisor’s opinion rests on professional judgment.

When you can’t rely on verifiable data to prove how much work is done, you turn to expert judgment to value progress. The supervisor’s opinion captures this because a qualified supervisor or expert uses their experience and understanding of the task to estimate how far along the work is. This subjective assessment is appropriate when measurable evidence isn’t available or is hard to obtain yet. In contrast, Start/Finish depends on scheduling and observable milestones, units completed require counting tangible deliverables, and cost ratio relies on actual costs compared to planned costs. All of those depend on data you can verify, whereas the supervisor’s opinion rests on professional judgment.